Sign up here for the weekly email newsletter

Pokémon Go

Late to the party, I have some thoughts about Pokémon Go:

1. The statement I’ve heard the most about Pokémon Go is that it just showed the world what augmented reality is. For those who already knew what AR is, Pokémon Go shows us what it actually looks like when it becomes relevant—not a sci-fi transformation to a world where we all stagger around with headsets (although we might still get that) but a world in which we all stare at our phones a little bit more than we did before. Too many of our predictions about the technological future assume visually stunning outcomes driven by advanced hardware (an industrial age bias), but those changes are almost always outpaced by the faster progress of software, running on devices we already have. The near future rarely looks different than the present.

Acknowledging that smartphones are how AR first goes mainstream—now a fact not a prediction—it isn’t a stretch to also acknowledge that reality has already been augmented for a long time via smartphones, just spatially rather than visually. Pokémon Go, because it’s a game, offers a more immersive and totalizing example, a more literal example of AR. Every smartphone app that already takes your location as input or interacts with your environment —Instagram, Yelp, Google Maps, Shazam, to name a few on my home screen—already read the physical world we inhabit and write to their digital representation of that world (not to mention Snapchat, whose filters are AR by any definition). Looking at your phone, gathering metadata about your surroundings from Instagram or Yelp, and then looking back up with a new perspective: That sequence is only one level of abstraction away from what Pokémon Go does.

I always imagined AR as the technology that would finally get us past the iPhone, enabling us to look straight ahead instead of staring at screens constantly. Eventually we might get the killer app for some Google Glass successor that gets us all wearing headsets, but until then we have to spend more time staring down at our phones in even more awkward ways. That bent posture—not shiny new hardware—is the visual manifestation of AR today. At least Pokémon Go is getting people out of their houses.


2. There’s another sense in which Pokémon Go is only a change in degree from the recent past, not a change in kind. As pointed out on a recent a16z podcast, Pokémon Go is an “appified game” instead of the more familiar “gamified app.” Everything from Foursquare to Snapchat to any social media platform that scores a user’s content by number of likes operates according to game logic and reinscribes that game on real life. Pokemon Go inverts this dynamic by making the fantasy the end instead of the means, and the reality the means instead of the end: Rather than looking for a bar to hang out at and incidentally becoming the mayor, we’re hunting for Vaporeon and incidentally hanging out in a park. Amazingly, the latter seems to motivate people more than the former.

Gamification has demonstrated its ability to simplify reality and compel behavior that would otherwise lack sufficient motivation. Pokémon Go suggests that games themselves might compel us even more than merely gamified things. Long before apps or gamification existed as ideas, society was full of more concrete but similarly playful (and powerful) game-like dynamics. Following this thread backward from the present, we can only conclude that it’s games all the way down.

2 Comments on “Pokémon Go”

  1. Ankur says:

    I think what’s clear here is that Pokemon as entertainment was always really popular, but Go really lowers the boundary to entry (no need for hardware, easiest distribution, low bar of behavioral shift required thanks the ubiquity of smartphones), which impels the popularity (apart from some element of virality/social proofing that I don’t fully understand.

    I’m not sure if you could generalise a lesson from this for the future of AR, or even gaming applications of AR.

    On Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 10:45 PM, Kneeling Bus < > wrote:

    > kneelingbus posted: “Late to the party, I have some thoughts about Pokémon > Go: 1. The statement I’ve heard the most about Pokémon Go is that it just > showed the world what augmented reality is. For those who already knew what > AR is, Pokémon Go shows us what it actually looks ” >

  2. kneelingbus says:

    Definitely – it’s interesting seeing so many adults who previously paid no attention to Pokemon getting hooked. This also makes me realize that it could have been any number of popular games having this success (Angry Birds or something) by following the same AR model. The key as you mention must be the low barriers to entry–few will shell out money for unproven hardware but anyone will download another app on their current phone, and due to the real-world interaction it becomes more interesting with more people playing, .

    Most people probably don’t even think of it as AR, based on conversations I’ve had in the last few weeks.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s